Markel American Insurance Company v. Cockrell
| 3:2006cv00603 |
| August 21, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Docia L Dalby |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
JUDGMENT...It is ordered, adjudged and decreed, that a declaratory judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff, Markel American Insurance Company, and against defendant Sturgon L. Cockrell declaring there is no coverage under plaintiff's policy. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 3/31/2010. (LSM, )
|
|
Filing
45
RULING on Motion for Summary Judgment... 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Markel American Insurance Company is granted in part and denied in part......The court grants the plaintiff's motion to extend expert deadlines. 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sturgon L. Cockrell is denied. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 11/17/09. (LSM, ) Modified on 11/18/2009 (LSM, ).
|
|
Filing
26
RULING denying 15 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim filed by Markel American Insurance Company for failure to join an indispensable party.. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 2/4/08. (HCJ, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Markel American Insurance Company v. Cockrell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
