Barcosh, Ltd v. Dumas et al
| 3:2006cv00616 |
| August 24, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
260
Garnishment Judgment granting 258 Motion for Entry of Garnishment Order. IT IS ORDERED that the clerk of court accept all payment of funds from Garnishees, and deposit them into the registry of this court to be held in an interest bearing account until further order of the court. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 8/11/2010. (CMM,)
|
|
Filing
259
RULING denying 253 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 8/11/2010. (CMM, )
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER: The court notifies Dumas & Associates Law Firm, LLC, as garnishee that it does not appear to be complying with the order mandating "a full accounting to the court at each date when settlements are made with Walter C. Dumas regarding any compensation owed to him, and Dumas & Associates Law Firm, L.L.C.". Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 1/14/09. (BP, ) Modified on 1/14/2009 to edit text (BP, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barcosh, Ltd v. Dumas et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
