Travis et al v. Laiche et al
| Joanne Travis and Sylvia Smith |
| Jacob Laiche, Darren Ramirez and John Little |
| 3:2007cv00695 |
| September 26, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Iberville |
| Christine Noland |
| John V. Parker |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
RULING: The Court concludes that defts have failed to carry their burden as to qualified immunity in their 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. Because the defts have failed to offer any undisputed material facts as to pltfs "incidental claims," the Court cannot properly determine whether summary judgment is appropriate as to those claims. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 9/15/2009. (JDL, )
|
|
Filing
39
NOTICE TO COUNSEL: as to 36 Defts MOTION for Summary Judgment. Within 10 days of this order, pltfs shall either comply with ULLR 56,2 by filing a short and concise statement of material facts, or the uncontroverted facts alleged by defts in the Statement of Undisputed Facts (doc. 36-2) will be deemed admitted for purposes of the motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 7/14/2009. (JDL, )
|
|
Filing
35
RULING denying 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by John Little, Darren Ramirez, Jacob Laiche for failure to comply with the court's Local Rules. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 3/11/2009. (JDL, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
