Saizan v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Parish of Pointe Coupee d/b/a Pointe Coupee General Hospital through the Pointe Coupee Police Jury
Travis Saizan |
Hospital Service District No. 1, Parish of Pointe Coupee |
3:2008cv00332 |
June 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
East Baton Rouge |
James J. Brady |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
no cause specified |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Saizan v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Parish of Pointe Coupee d/b/a Pointe Coupee General Hospital through the Pointe Coupee Police Jury | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Travis Saizan | |
Represented By: | Jill L. Craft Alford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hospital Service District No. 1, Parish of Pointe Coupee | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.