Jarreau v. Quackenbush

Case Number: 3:2008cv00557
Filed: September 2, 2008
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Office: Contract: Other Office
Referring Judge: Stephen C. Riedlinger
Presiding Judge: Ralph E. Tyson
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 5, 2010 31 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff Doherty Michael Jarreau against defendants Lamar Quakenbush and Diane Quakenbush in the amount of $18,944, with legal interest thereon from the date of judicial demand until the date of this judgment at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. 1961. Defendants' counterclaim for conversion is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 2/5/2010. (CMM, )
February 2, 2010 29 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION: Pltf and defts formed a joint venture contractual agreement, as stated. Judgment will be rendered in favor of the pltf Doherty Michael Jarreau against defts Diane and Lamar Quakenbush in the amount of $18,944. Defts counterclaim for conversion will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 2/1/2010. (JDL, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jarreau v. Quackenbush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?