Randolph v. London et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 12, 2010
OPINION Adopting 32 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. 21 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by James LeBlanc shall be granted, dismissing the pla's claims against this dft for failure of the pla to exhaust admi nistrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§ 1997e. 22 Motion to Dismiss filed by G. London shall be granted, dismissing the pla's claims asserted against this dft in the dft's official capacity. Pla's remaining claims shall be dismissed as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915, and that this action shall be dismissed. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 1/12/10. (BP, )
|December 8, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust and 22 MOTION to Dismiss. It is recommended that the motion for partial summary judgment of defendant James LeBlanc be granted, dismissing the pla 039;s claims against this dft for failure of the pla to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. It is further recommended that the motion to dismiss of dft G. London, be granted, dismissing the pla's claims asserted a gainst this dft in the dft's official capacity. It is further recommended that the pla's remaining claims be dismissed as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and that this action be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 12/21/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 12/8/09. (BP, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?