Benoit v. MedVance

Plaintiff: Jimmie L. Benoit
Defendant: MedVance
Case Number: 3:2009cv00223
Filed: April 16, 2009
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: East Baton Rouge
Presiding Judge: James J. Brady
Referring Judge: Christine Noland
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 10, 2011 65 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM RULLING regarding 51 MOTION to Strike Portions of the Declarations Filed in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by MedVance Institute of Baton Rouge and/or KIMC Investments L.P., 38 Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MedVance Institute of Baton Rouge and/or KIMC Investments L.P. Signed by Honorable James T. Trimble, Jr on 03/09/2011. (Williams, Lysandra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benoit v. MedVance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmie L. Benoit
Represented By: Dawn N. Guillot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MedVance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?