Villar v. Astrue
| Susan Villar |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2010cv00432 |
| June 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Docia L Dalby |
| Frank J. Polozola |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
OPINION Adopting 22 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge as to the 20 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Susan Villar. The defendant is ordered to pay plaintiff's attorney's fees in the amount of $3,225.00. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 2/1/2012. (LSM)
|
|
Filing
18
OPINION Adopting 17 Report and Recommendations...that, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), a final judgment shall be entered reversing the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits and remanding the matter to the Commiss ioner for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court, including the presentation of any further relevant evidence developed by the parties, the reinspection of the medical records, including giving full consideration to the opinions of the treating physician, Dr. Knapp, and the treating specialist, Dr. Patel, and the reconsideration of the weight given to these opinions...Judgment shall be entered...Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 09/28/2011. (KDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
