Wilson v. Cain et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 29, 2013
RULING Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 57 Motion for Summary Judgment and 63 Motion for Summary Judgment are denied and this action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Shelly D. Dick on 05/28/2013. (NLT)
|February 5, 2013
RULING denying 58 Sealed Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal. If, within 15 days, the defts do not withdraw the Report as support of their summary judgment motion, the clerk of court will be directed to unseal the Report and the defts will be required to serve the pltf with a copy of it. Alternatively, the defts may re-file their motion, as stated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 2/5/2013. (JDL)
|January 30, 2013
SUPPLEMENTAL RULING regarding 52 Order on Motion to Compel. Insofar as the pltf sought to compel the production of Capt. Luke Rheams' Disciplinary Reports, the motion to compel is now denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 1/30/2013. (JDL)
|November 30, 2011
RULING Adopting 19 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss 15 is granted and this action shall be dismissed, unless within 14 days from the date of this ruling, plaintiff fil es an amended complaint alleging facts sufficiently to show a claim upon which relief can be granted against defendants. Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Luke Rheams, N. Burl Cain, Leslie Dupont,. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 11/23/11. (DCB)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?