Keys et al v. Dean Morris, L.L.P. et al
| Cheryl Lynette Keys and Willie Lionel Keys |
| Coldwell Banker Mackey Co,, Jamie Crane, Dean Morris, L.L.P., Family Enterprises, Inc. and Key Mortgage Services, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv00049 |
| January 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Frank J. Polozola |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
RULING granting 75 Motion for Summary Judgment. All claims asserted against the Defendants, Jamie Crane and the Mackey Company, are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 06/04/2014. (CGP)
|
|
Filing
54
RULING denying 51 Motion for Reconsideration of 46 Order on Motion to Dismiss filed by Dean Morris, L.L.P. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 5/30/2013. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
46
RULING denying 5 Motion to Dismiss, converted to Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 2/19/2013. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
15
OPINION Adopting 10 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 3 Motion to Remand filed by Willie Lionel Keys, Cheryl Lynette Keys is denied and this matter is referred back to the USMJ for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 04/18/2012. (NLT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
