Dill v. Ascension Parish et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 11, 2013
RULING approving the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and adopting it as the court's opinion herein. The Plaintiff's claims asserted against the Ascension Parish Correctional Center and the "Medical Provider fo r Ascension Parish Correctional Center" are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and the 27 , 31 Motions for Summary Judgment of the remaining defendants are GRANTED dismissing the plaintiff's claims, with prejudice, and this action is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 9/11/2013. (LLH)
|August 19, 2013
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jeffery Wiley, Ramond McNeil, Paul Hall, and 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ascension Parish, Ty Gauteaux, Michelle Gaudin, Tommy Martinez. It is re commended that the plaintiff's claims asserted against the Ascension Parish Correctional Center and the "Medical Provider for Ascension Parish Correctional Center" be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be gra nted and that the Motions for Summary Judgment of the remaining defendants, rece. doc. nos 27 and 31, be granted, dismissing the plaintiff's claims, with prejudice, and that this action be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 08/19/2013. (CGP)
|August 6, 2013
ORDER denying plaintiff's 46 Motion for Temporary Injunction. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 8/6/2013. (LLH)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?