Jackson et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
Roshaunda Jackson, J.C.D. and Cornell Dukes |
XYZ Insurance Company, Turner Industries, LLC, Monsanto Company, Melinda Sanford, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, The Shaw Group, Inc., Mark Graham and Todd Bartow |
3:2012cv00581 |
September 20, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
James J. Brady |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 RULING denying 43 Motion for Entry of Lone Pine Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 8/7/2013. (SMG) |
Filing 48 RULING: Plaintiffs' 45 Motion to Amend Order and Stay Proceedings and to have this matter certified for immediate interlocutory appeal is denied. Signed by District Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/23/13. (DCB) |
Filing 35 RULING Adopting 33 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 20 Motion to Remand is denied. Signed by District Judge Shelly D. Dick on 07/01/2013. (CGP) |
Filing 29 ORDER to Amend Notice of Removal. The removing defendant Syngenta CropProtection, LLC shall have 14 days to file an Amended Notice of Removal which clarifies its organizational form, and if it is a limited liability company properly alleges its citizenship. Alternatively, the defendant may file an amended answer which does the same thing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 06/04/2013. (CGP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.