Haspel, L.L.C. v. Haspel Worldwide, L.L.C.

Defendant: Haspel Worldwide, L.L.C., LA
Plaintiff: Haspel, L.L.C., DE
Case Number: 3:2013cv00185
Filed: March 21, 2013
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge: James J. Brady
Referring Judge: Richard L. Bourgeois
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 2, 2013 19 Opinion or Order of the Court RULING 18 Adopting Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 5 Motion to Remand is granted. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 10/02/2013. (NLT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haspel, L.L.C. v. Haspel Worldwide, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Haspel Worldwide, L.L.C., LA
Represented By: George Davidson Fagan
Represented By: Alex P. Tilling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Haspel, L.L.C., DE
Represented By: Richard Franklin Zimmerman, Jr.
Represented By: Randal J. Robert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.