Williamson v. Department of Corrections, State of Louisiana et al
| Marvin M. Williamson, Jr. |
| Department of Corrections, State of Louisiana and James LeBlanc |
| 3:2013cv00205 |
| March 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
RULING Adopting 20 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge: The plaintiff's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, the defendant's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the claims against James LeBlanc are D ISMISSED. The plaintiff's claim against the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections are DISMISSED as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), and without leave to amend because there is no conceivable, non-frivolous federal claim the plaintiff could assert against the defendant consistent with the facts alleged in his complaint and this action is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 03/02/2015. (BCL)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER AND REASONS. ORDERED that the instant matter be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana. Case transferred to District of Middle Louisiana. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr.(gec, )[Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 3/29/2013.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
