Gann v. Commissioner of Social Security
Tabitha Marie Gann |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
Social Security Administration |
3:2014cv00189 |
April 1, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Brian A. Jackson |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 RULING and ORDER granting in part 21 Petition for Attorney Fees. The Commissioner is ordered to remit to Plaintiff's counsel a check made payable to Tabitha Gann for attorney fees in the amount of $8,145.00 (44.4 hours at $175.00; 5 hours at $75.00), plus costs in the amount of $400.00, payable from the Judgment Fund of the Treasury Department, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 1304. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 1/27/2017. (SGO) |
Filing 20 RULING AND ORDER granting 16 Motion for Attorney Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 8/5/2016. (LLH) |
Filing 15 RULING Adopting the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. FURTHER ORDERED that the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's decision denying Plaintiff Tabitha M. Gann's application for disability insurance benefits is REVERSED. FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for reevaluation. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 9/14/2015. (JDL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.