Honeycutt et al v. The City of Baton Rouge, et al
||Jackie Plunkett Honeycutt and Leo Baxter Honeycutt, III
||Arcadis U.S., Inc., CH2M Hill, Inc., City of Baton Rouge, Entergy Corporation, Layne Heavy Civil, Inc., Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and Parish of East Baton Rouge
||July 16, 2015
||US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
||Baton Rouge Office
||John W. deGravelles
||Stephen C. Riedlinger
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 22, 2016
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 43 Joint Rule 16 Motion. The Motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks to have Plaintiffs prohibited from introducing any expert opinions at trial. The Motion is GRANTED in part to permit mo dification of the Scheduling Order. The 36 Scheduling Order is modified as follows: Plaintiff`s Expert Witness List due by 8/21/2016. Defendant`s Expert Witness List due by 9/20/2016. Plaintiff`s Expert Reports due by 9/20/2016. Defendant`s Expert Reports due by 10/31/2016. Discovery from Experts due by 12/30/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 7/22/2016. (LLH)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?