Mason v. East Baton Rouge Parish Prison Sheriff Office et al
Claude L. Mason |
East Baton Rouge Parish Prison Sheriff Office, Sid J. Gautreaux, III and Dennis Grimes |
3:2016cv00205 |
March 30, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Shelly D. Dick |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 RULING Adopting 39 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied and theMotion for Summary Judgment of Defendants, Sid J. Gautreaux, Il l and Dennis Grimes is granted, dismissing Pla intiff's claims asserted against Defendants, without prejudice, for failure of Plaintiff to exhaust administrative remedies as mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and this action is dismissed. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 08/22/2017. (ELW) |
Filing 37 RULING Adopting 28 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 9 Motion to Dismiss is granted and the 8 Motion to Dismiss is denied to reassertion of the exhaustion issue in a properly supported motion for summary judgment. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in connection with Plaintiff's claims asserted against these defendants. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 02/07/2017. (EDC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.