Aikens v. Johnson et al
| David Aikens |
| Benjamin Johnson and Merrell Lynch- Bank of America |
| 3:2016cv00729 |
| October 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Shelly D. Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Banks and Banking |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
RULING: The 26 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, MOTION to Dismiss Merrill Lynch, MOTION to Stay Pending Arbitration, is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. The Court will not dismiss this action but will stay matter pending arbitration. The 24 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's 33 MOTION to Not Dismiss Case or Compel any Arbitration is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as written. This case is stayed and shall be administratively closed pending the arbitration proceedings. It is further ordered that the parties shall advise the Court of the findings of the arbitration proceedings within 30 days of the arbitrators ruling. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/28/2017. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
12
RULING Adopting 7 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. This matter shall be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) based on Plaintiffs failure to appear, as ordered, at a scheduled hearing in this matter. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 12/07/2016. (NLT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
