Blackmon et al v. Bracken Construction Company, Inc. et al
| Ruthie Blackmon and Ted Mario Blackmon |
| Bracken Construction Company, Inc., C3 Construction Company Services, Inc., Jhon Evelio Jaramillo, The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, Travelers Excess and Surplus Lines Company, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and Anthony Ver Meer |
| 3:2018cv00142 |
| February 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Richard L. Bourgeois |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
313
ORDER denying 295 Motion for Appeal/Review and Objections to Magistrate Judge's November 16, 2020 Order. Defendants shall comply with the Magistrate Judges November 16, 2020 Order. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 8/26/2021. (ELW)
|
|
Filing
312
ORDER: Plaintiff's 282 MOTION for Review of Magistrate Judge's Order is DENIED. Plaintiff's 283 Motion to Stay Magistrate Judge's Order Pending Review, 284 MOTION for Expedited Consideration of MOTION to Stay Magistrate Judge's Order, and 289 Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment are TERMINATED as moot. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 5/25/2021. (KMW)
|
|
Filing
310
ORDER: The 213 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses is Granted as written. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 1/15/2021. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
287
ORDER: Plaintiffs' 213 Motion to Compel is granted in part and otherwise denied. Plaintiffs' 237 Motion for Leave to Propound Additional Interrogatories is denied. The Insurer Defendants' 244 Motion for Protective Order is denied. Plaintiffs' 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 and 256 Motions to Compel are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 11/16/2020. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
278
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 210 Motion to Compel and the discovery issues briefed by the parties (R. Docs. 204 and 205) are resolved consistent with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 10/14/2020. (EDC)
|
|
Filing
236
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 215 Motion to Quash Subpoena. The subpoena is modified in accordance with this Order. Bracken shall provide a copy of this Order to TracFone within 7 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 11/8/2019. (SWE)
|
|
Filing
196
RULING AND ORDER denying without prejudice 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190 Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 8/29/2019. (SWE)
|
|
Filing
159
RULING AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 136 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as set forth herein. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 5/31/2019. (SWE) Modified on 6/3/2019 to edit the text (SWE).
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER granting 76 and 77 Motions to Bifurcate. Motion to Dismiss 86 is WITHOUT EFFECT. Granting in part and denying in part 88 Motion to Enforce Settlements AND granting in part and denying in part 104 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 04/08/2019. (ELW)
|
|
Filing
69
RULING AND ORDER: Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 28 is DENIED. Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction 32 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 09/14/2018. (ELW)
|
|
Filing
68
RULING AND ORDER: The 30 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 8/27/2018. (KAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
