BMTP, LLC v. RBH, Inc et al
BMTP, LLC |
CMH Homes, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc., CMH Services, Inc, NTA, Inc and RBH, Inc |
3:2018cv00352 |
March 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Shelly D. Dick |
Richard L. Bourgeois |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 RULING : granting 26 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue. This case shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 01/30/2019. (ELW) |
Filing 19 RULING and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Extension of Time to Oppose Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. Plaintiff shall file an Opposition to the Defendants' Motion on or before Ma y 2, 2018. Granting 17 Motion for Briefing Schedule to Respond to Plaintiff's Opposed Motion for Extension of Time to Oppose CMH defendants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and to Conduct Jurisdictional Discovery. Defendants shall file a Reply on or before May 11, 2018. Thereafter, the Court will determine whether Plaintiffs are entitled to jurisdictional discovery. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 4/26/2018. (EDC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.