Netterville et al v. Ace American Insurance Company et al
Kenneth Netterville and Joshua Ketchum |
Ace American Insurance Company, Jacobs Field Services North America Inc., Mario Sequoia and Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
3:2018cv01071 |
December 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Shelly D Dick |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION to Remand by Joshua Ketchum, Kenneth Netterville. (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Affidavit, #4 cover letter)(EDC) |
Filing 11 Notice to Counsel: In light of recent correspondence to the court, plaintiffs' counsel is GRANTED leave to file a motion to remand conventionally through the clerk's office by no later than 2/1/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
Filing 10 Letter dated 1/29/2019 from Joseph C. Possa to Judge Wilder-Doomes Re: filing and server issues. (BLR) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #12 MOTION to Remand. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (EDC) |
Filing 9 Letter dated 1/25/2019 from Joseph C. Possa and Cullen R. Clement to Judge Wilder-Doomes Re: counsel did not receive electronic notice from the court regarding the 1/25/2018 show cause hearing. (BLR) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel: Due to an unforeseen scheduling conflict with the court, the Show Cause Hearing set for January 25, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. has been moved to 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 before Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes. NOTE: TIME CHANGE ONLY. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.)(BLR) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: On December 20, 2018, removing defendants were ordered to file a memorandum and supporting evidence regarding the amount in controversy. R. Doc. 3. Per that same order, Plaintiffs were ordered to file either: (1) a memorandum and supporting evidence concerning whether the amount in controversy requirement of 28 U.S.C. 1332 met; or (2) a Motion to Remand within ten (10) days after the filing of the removing defendants' memorandum regarding the amount in controversy. R. Doc. 3. Removing defendants submitted a Memorandum in Support of Amount in Controversy Requirement on December 31, 2018. R. Doc. 4. Plaintiffs have not timely filed either the memorandum and supporting evidence or a Motion to Remand. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for Plaintiffs shall personally appear on January 25, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. before the Magistrate Judge at the Russell B. Long Federal Building and Courthouse, 777 Florida Street, Courtroom Number 5, in Baton Rouge, Louisiana and SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the December 20, 2018 Notice and Order. Alternatively, Plaintiffs may file either: (1) a memorandum and supporting evidence concerning whether the amount in controversy requirement of 28 U.S.C. 1332 met; or (2) a Motion to Remand by no later than 12:00 p.m. on January 18, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 1/15/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.)(BLR) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jacobs Field Services North America Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. for Jacobs Field Services North America Inc... (Petree, C.) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Ace American Insurance Company, Jacobs Field Services North America Inc., Mario Sequoia.(Petree, C.) |
Filing 4 Memorandum in Support of Amount in Controversy Requirement to #3 Notice and Order filed by Ace American Insurance Company, Jacobs Field Services North America Inc., Mario Sequoia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Petree, C.) Modified on 1/2/2019 to edit the text (KAH). |
Filing 3 NOTICE AND ORDER: Ace American Insurance Company, Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc., and Mario Seqouia (the Removing Defendants) shall file a memorandum and supporting evidence concerning whether the amount in controversy requirement of 28 U.S.C. 1332 is met, within ten (10) days of this Notice and Order as to #1 Notice of Removal. Memorandum and supporting evidence due by 12/31/2018.. Plaintiffs shall file either: (1) a memorandum and supporting evidence concerning whether the amount in controversy requirement of 28 U.S.C. 1332 is met; or (2) a Motion to Remand within ten (10) days after the filing of the Removing Defendants memorandum regarding the amount in controversy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 12/20/2018. (ELW) |
Filing 2 Consent to Removal by Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (ELW) (Main Document 2 replaced on 12/14/2018) (ELW). Modified on 12/14/2018 to correct document (ELW). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 19th JDC, East Baton Rouge Parish, Case Number 675870. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-1872272), filed by Jacobs Field Services North America Inc., Ace American Insurance Company, Mario Sequoia. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Petition for Damages, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Medical Record, #4 Exhibit Allstate Consent to Removal)(Petree, C.) (Attachment 3 replaced on 12/10/2018) (ELW). Modified on 12/10/2018 to correct page orientation (ELW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.