Landry v. Thompson et al
| John Landry |
| G Thompson, Unknown Houston, Unknown Lollis and Unknown Williams |
| 3:2019cv00520 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Prisoner Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Confirmation of receipt of payment from JOHN LANDRY, III in the amount of $1.33. Transaction posted on 9/9/2019. Receipt number 4699029649 processed by kwilcox. (TDA) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. It is ordered that the plaintiff pay an initial partial filing fee of $1.33 in accordance with 28 USC 1915. A copy of this order shall be sent to the plaintiff and to Centralized Inmate Banking. Filing Fee due by 9/3/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 8/12/2019. (EDC)
|
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by John Landry. (KMW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Unknown Houston, Unknown Lollis, G Thompson, Unknown Williams, filed by John Landry. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(KMW) |
| ***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (KMW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
