Specialized Industrial Maintenance, Inc. v. APTIM Maintenance, LLC
| Specialized Industrial Maintenance, Inc. |
| APTIM Maintenance, LLC |
| 3:2019cv00804 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by APTIM Maintenance, LLC.(Funes, Kelsey) |
Filing 3
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 2/6/2020 at 09:00 AM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes. Status Report due by 1/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 11/25/2019. (EDC)
|
| Filing 2 Letter to Attorney David Sinnott Bland regarding Allison R. Colon who is Co-Counsel for party Specialized Industrial Maintenance, Inc. Attorney is not admitted to practice in LAMD. (SWE) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 19th Judicial District Court, Case Number 689491. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-2034872), filed by APTIM Maintenance, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court Record, #3 Exhibit 2 - Certificate of Counsel, #4 Exhibit 3 - List of Parties and Counsel, #5 Exhibit 4 - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal)(Funes, Kelsey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
