Montgomery v. Capital One Bank
Monique Montgomery |
Capital One Bank |
3:2020cv00416 |
June 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Richard L Bourgeois |
John W deGravelles |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 There is no record document. Entered in error by case adminstrator (KMW). |
Filing 8 MOTION/Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Monique Montgomery. (KMW) Modified on 8/4/2020 to edit the event type and docket text (KMW). |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Capital One Bank identifying Corporate Parent Capital One Financial Corporation for Capital One Bank.. (Hare, Eli) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or In the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement by Capital One Bank. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Pleading;)(Hare, Eli). Added MOTION for a more definite Statement 7/30/2020 (ELW). |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 9/3/2020 at 02:00 PM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr. Status Report due by 8/20/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 7/8/2020. (SGO) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant identified as Capital One Bank, properly known as Capital One, N.A. to respond to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is hereby extended to and including July 28, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 7/8/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (Bourgeois, Richard) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Capital One Bank identifying Corporate Parent Capital One Financial Corporation for Capital One Bank.. (Hare, Eli) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (SWE) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by Capital One Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Hare, Eli) Modified on 7/7/2020 to edit the docket text (SWE). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Baton Rouge City, Parish of East Baton Rouge LA, Case Number 20-00507. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAMDC-2134920), filed by Capital One Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Hare, Eli) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/1/2020) (ELW). Modified on 7/1/2020 to rotate pages (ELW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Montgomery v. Capital One Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Monique Montgomery | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Capital One Bank | |
Represented By: | Eli J Hare |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.