Blount v. Flagship Credit Acceptance
Daysha Blount |
Flagship Credit Acceptance |
3:2020cv00676 |
October 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Shelly D Dick |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time pursuant to Local Rule 7(a). Defendant Flagship Credit Acceptance LLC SHALL answer orotherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint on or before January 7, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 12/2/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (BLR) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time Answer or Respond to Complaint by Flagship Credit Acceptance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(Reagin, Patrick) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #7 MOTION for Extension of Time Answer or Respond to Complaint. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (ELW) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Flagship Credit Acceptance served on 11/16/2020, answer due 12/7/2020. (US Marshal, ) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 1/7/2021 at 10:00 AM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes. Status Report due by 12/24/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 10/16/2020. (BLR) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Flagship Credit Acceptance. (Summons submitted to the USM for service) (KMW) Modified on 10/14/2020 to edit the docket text (KMW). |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall file the Complaint without prepayment of costs or security and the Clerk of Court is directed to issue process to the defendant(s). Daysha Blount will be required to provide to the United States Marshals service a completed U.S. Marshal Form 285 for each defendant to be served. The United States Marshals Service will not serve the defendant(s) without a properly completed form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 10/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 USM form) (KMW) (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/14/2020 to add routing) (KMW). |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daysha Blount. (KMW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Flagship Credit Acceptance, filed by Daysha Blount. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Attachment)(KMW) |
***Set CASE REFERRED Pro Se (non-inmate) Flag (KMW) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Blount v. Flagship Credit Acceptance | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daysha Blount | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Flagship Credit Acceptance | |
Represented By: | Patrick Blair Reagin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.