Myles et al v. Walmart Inc.
Alfeda Lang and Bracey Myles |
Walmart Inc. |
3:2020cv00783 |
November 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Brian A Jackson |
Scott D Johnson |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable on #5 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Discovery. Mail returned from Alfeda Land. Reason: Return to Sender- No Such Street. Unable to Forward (KMW) |
Filing 5 ORDER denying without prejudice #4 Motion to Serve Summons and Complaint Motion for Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 12/18/2020. (KAH) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #4 MOTION to Serve Summons and Complaint MOTION for Discovery. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Serve Summons and Complaint, MOTION for Discovery by Bracey Myles. (KMW) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Pro Se E-Service and E-Notice Consent Form by Bracey Myles. (EDC) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alfeda Lang, Bracey Myles. (KMW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Walmart Inc., filed by Bracey Myles, Alfeda Lang. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)(KMW) |
***Set CASE REFERRED Pro Se (non-inmate) Flag (KMW) |
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (KMW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.