Sidhu et al v. Blinken et al
Plaintiff: Gursukhman Sidhu, Shweta Sidhu, A. D. S. and H. S.
Defendant: Antony Blinken, Thomas Parillo, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Donna P. Campagnolo and Merrick Garland
Case Number: 3:2022cv00064
Filed: January 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Richard L Bourgeois
Referring Judge: Shelly D Dick
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 GENERAL ORDER: All pleadings and other papers filed under seal in civil and criminal actions shall be maintained under seal for thirty days following final disposition of the action. After that time, all sealed pleadings and other papers shall be placed in the case record unless a District Judge or Magistrate Judge, upon motion and for good cause shown, orders that the pleading or other paper be maintained under seal. The deadline for filing any motions regarding the unsealing of any document shall be within thirty days of the final disposition of any action and shall contain a concise statement of reasons for maintaining the pleading or other paper under seal. ATTENTION: If a motion to retain documents under seal is NOT filed, all documents shall be placed in the public case record, unless specifically identified in the attached General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/8/2019. (SWE)
March 2, 2022 Filing 8 JUDGMENT: Considering Plaintiff's #7 Notice of Dismissal, this matter is dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear their own fees and costs. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 3/2/2022. (SWE)
February 28, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Gursukhman Sidhu, Shweta Sidhu (Schmitt, Brian)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: A Telephone Scheduling Conference is set for 4/7/2022 at 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr. Counsel for plaintiff(s) shall initiate the call to all parties then contact the Court at (225) 389-3602. Status Report due by 3/24/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 2/8/2022. (SGO)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Brian C. Schmitt to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiffs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 2/2/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (SGO)ATTENTION: Local counsel shall provide the following link to those attorneys granted leave to proceed pro hac vice in the Middle District of Louisiana who choose to register for e-file access #www.lamd.uscourts.gov/pro-hac-vice-e-filing-registration. \
February 1, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF Amended Declaration by Gursukhman Sidhu, Shweta Sidhu re #2 MOTION for Brian C. Schmitt to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2390516) (Yanik, Mary)
February 1, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Donna P. Campagnolo, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Thomas Parillo. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.), Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Donna P. Campagnolo, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Thomas Parillo, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (NLT)
February 1, 2022 MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Brian C. Schmitt to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2390516). This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (NLT)
January 31, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Brian C. Schmitt to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $100.00, Receipt Number ALAMDC-2390516) by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Schmitt Declaration, #3 Attachment Proposed Order)(Yanik, Mary)
January 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAMDC-2390507.), filed by A. D. S., Shweta Sidhu, Gursukhman Sidhu, H. S.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Attachment)(Yanik, Mary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sidhu et al v. Blinken et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gursukhman Sidhu
Represented By: Mary Catherine Yanik
Represented By: Brian C. Schmitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shweta Sidhu
Represented By: Mary Catherine Yanik
Represented By: Brian C. Schmitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A. D. S.
Represented By: Mary Catherine Yanik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: H. S.
Represented By: Mary Catherine Yanik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Parillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donna P. Campagnolo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?