Carline v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al
| Demone Carline |
| PepsiCo, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company |
| 3:2022cv00890 |
| November 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Shelly D Dick |
| Scott D Johnson |
| Contract: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Return on Electronic Transfer from Southern District of New York. (ELW) |
| Filing 12 Extraction Log of a case Transferred to Southern New York. (ELW) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Change Venue. This suit be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 1/4/2023. (ELW) Modified on 1/10/2023 to edit file date (ELW).
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by PepsiCo, Inc..(Masson, Jeff) |
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Change Venue by PepsiCo, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Masson, Jeff) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PepsiCo, Inc. (Masson, Jeff) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY with LR 7.1 as to #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Failure to file a Certificate of Interested Persons REQUIRED CORRECTION: Within one business day, the filer shall file a Certificate of Interested Persons and the interested persons shall be added to CM/ECF by the filer using the event Certificate of Interested Persons. OR Failure to add interested persons to CM/ECF upon filing of Certificate of Interested Persons REQUIRED CORRECTION: Within one business day, the filer shall add all interested persons listed on the certificate using the event Add Interested Person located under Notices in the CM/ECF system. (ELW) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Because the conditions of Local Rule 7(a) are met, Defendant's ex parte #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Plead is GRANTED, and Defendant now has until January 3, 2023, to respond to the Complaint (R. Doc. 1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 12/14/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no hyperlink or PDF document associated with this entry.) (KAH)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by PepsiCo, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Masson, Jeff) |
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (ELW) |
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 3/9/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson. Status Report due by 2/23/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson on 11/28/2022. (KAH)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (ELW) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Demone Carline identifying Affiliate/Interested Person PepsiCo, Inc., Affiliate/Interested Person Howard P Elliott, Jr., Affiliate/Interested Person Damone Carline, Affiliate/Interested Person Ace American Insurance Company for Demone Carline.. (Elliott, Howard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAMDC-2504323.), filed by Demone Carline. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Summons to PepsiCo, Inc., #3 Attachment Summons to Ace American Insurance Company)(Elliott, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
