Archille v. City of Jackson et al
Johnathan Archille |
Karla Bringedahl, R. Wells, Dustin Beckam, City of Jackson and Paul Toce |
3:2024cv00527 |
June 28, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Richard L Bourgeois |
Brian A Jackson |
Prisoner Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION(S) REFERRED: #3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account. This motion is now pending before the USMJ. (CIS) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Statement of Account by Johnathan Archille. (CIS) |
Filing 2 Letter of Deficiency: The Clerk has filed your new suit. However, it is deficient in the areas as stated herein. The deficiency must be corrected within the given time frame. Filing Fee due by 8/23/2024. Statement of Account due by 8/23/2024. (JEG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dustin Beckam, Karla Bringedahl, City of Jackson, Paul Toce, R. Wells, filed by Johnathan Archille. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Request for Administrative Remedy, #2 Exhibit B-Current Duty Status and Diet Orders, #3 Exhibit C-Request for Medical Treatment, #4 Exhibit D-Request Form, #5 Exhibit E-Pass, #6 Exhibit F-Request for Administrative Remedy, #7 Exhibit G-Article, #8 Exhibit H-Sick Call Request Form, #9 Exhibit I-First Step Response Form, #10 Invoice, #11 Proposed Order) (CIS) |
***Set CASE REFERRED Flag (PPS) (CIS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.