Hanks v. Marr
Plaintiff: Davin Hanks
Defendant: Daniel Marr
Case Number: 1:2015cv01740
Filed: May 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Avoyelles
Presiding Judge: Dee D Drell
Presiding Judge: James D Kirk
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 67 JUDGMENT adopting re 65 Report and Recommendations, granting 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Dee D Drell on 9/24/2017. (crt,Roaix, G)
April 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 55 JUDGMENT ADOPTING re 46 Report and Recommendations, granting 37 Sealed Motion. Signed by Chief Judge Dee D Drell on 4/7/2017. (crt,Roaix, G)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hanks v. Marr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Davin Hanks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Marr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?