Ross v. Corrections et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 27, 2016
MEMORANDUM RULING that pursuant to the Order of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal (R. #25) dated April 20, 2016, an evidentiary hearing was conducted by the undersigned on this date. After considering the testimony and documentary evidence introduced by the plaintiff and arguments by plaintiff and counsel for defendants, the court has determined that the Notice of Appeal by plaintiff, Ross was deposited at Avoyelles on November 11, 2015, which was two days past the time specified of said notice. Documents filed on October 29, 2015 and earlier in November clearly pertain to the Notice of Intent to Seek Writs (R. #15) from District Court. This would not have enlarged the time for filing petitioner's notice of appeal which was obviously u ntimely. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk send a copy of this Memorandum Ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal as part of its record in its docket number 15-31013 entitled Ira Ross v. Louisiana Dept. of Corr., et al USDC No. 1:15-cv-1943. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 4/27/16. (crt,WalkerSld, B)
|September 22, 2015
JUDGMENT ADOPTING ; Report and Recommendations re 8 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff complaint is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous under 28 U. S. C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. The Clerk of Court is instructed to send a copy of this judgment to the keeper of the Three Strikes List in Beaumont, Texas. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 9/22/15. (crt,Roaix, G)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?