Abram v. Stencil

Plaintiff: Samuel Roy Abram
Defendant: M A Stencil
Case Number: 1:2016cv01537
Filed: October 31, 2016
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Grant
Presiding Judge: Dee D Drell
Referring Judge: Joseph H L Perez-Montes
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 31, 2017 5 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 3 Report and Recommendations re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Samuel Roy Abram. IT IS ORDERED that the petition filed under §2241 challenging Abram's detention pursuant to securities or bond is DENIED AND DISMISSED. To the extent that Abram seeks to challenge his conviction, the petition is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 1/31/2017. (crt,Keifer, K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abram v. Stencil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel Roy Abram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M A Stencil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?