Jeansonne v. Social Security Administration
| Cathy L Jeansonne |
| U S Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| 1:2018cv01121 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 7 EXHIBIT re #6 Summons Returned Executed as to USA (Social Security), by Cathy L Jeansonne. (aty,Osterhout, Karl) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed in Social Security Case by Cathy L Jeansonne. U S Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 10/3/2018, answer due 1/2/2019. Service made upon: U S Attorney;U S Attorney General;Commissioner of SSA. (aty,Osterhout, Karl) Modified on 10/12/2018 to indicate #7 legible copy of return receipt cards submitted as separate document. (Crick, S). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to US Attorney, US Attorney General and Comm of Social Security (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for appearance of Karl E Osterhout for Cathy L Jeansonne. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 8/30/2018. (crt,Crick, S)
|
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 8/30/2018. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Karl Osterhout to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Admission fee: $105, receipt number 0536-3739923) by Cathy L. Jeansonne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing re Karl Osterhout, #2 Proposed order)(aty,Lane, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U S Commissioner Social Security Administration (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0536-3739915) filed by Cathy L. Jeansonne. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Matthew David Lane, Jr added to party Cathy L. Jeansonne(pty:pla))(aty,Lane, Matthew) |
| CASE Assigned to Unassigned District Judge and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jeansonne v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cathy L Jeansonne | |
| Represented By: | Matthew David Lane, Jr |
| Represented By: | Karl E Osterhout |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U S Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Cristina Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
