Frick v. Berryhill
| David B Frick |
| Nancy A Berryhill |
| 1:2019cv00860 |
| July 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Dee D Drell |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. (crt,Crick, S) |
| NOTICE of Corrective Action to Barbara J Mixon on behalf of David B Frick regarding #5 Summons Returned Executed. Action taken: Docket text modified to reflect correct answer due date of 10/22/2019 as an incorrect answer date was entered at the time of e-filing. (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David B Frick. Nancy A Berryhill served on 7/24/2019, answer due 10/22/2019; Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration served on 7/24/2019, answer due 10/22/2019. (aty,Mixon, Barbara) Modified on 7/30/2019 to correct answer due date as an erroneous answer due date was entered at time of e-filing. (Crick, S). |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 7/10/2019. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to US Attorney, US Attorney General and Comm of Social Security (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 7/9/2019. (crt,Crick, S)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (In Forma Pauperis status requested and/or granted) filed by David B Frick. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Affidavit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #3 Proposed order)(Attorney Barbara J Mixon added to party David B Frick(pty:pla))(aty,Mixon, Barbara) |
| REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to All Defendants, requested by David B Frick. (aty,Mixon, Barbara) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Dee D Drell and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
| MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David B Frick. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY: (THE PDF IMAGE CAN BE FOUND IN ATTACHMENT #2 OF DOCUMENT #1 COMPLAINT. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Frick v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David B Frick | |
| Represented By: | Barbara J Mixon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Cristina Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
