Ouattara v. Deille et al
| Ibrahim Ahmed Rachid Ouattara |
| Warden Keith Deille, Field Office Dir Dianne L Witte, Dianne L Witte and Keith Deille |
| 1:2021cv00584 |
| March 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| David C Joseph |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 3/10/2021. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to U S Attorney, U S Attorney General, Keith Deille, Dianne L Witte. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge David C Joseph and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number ALAWDC-4598326) filed by Ibrahim Ahmed Rachid Ouattara. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Joseph Saverio Giardina added to party Ibrahim Ahmed Rachid Ouattara(pty:pla))(aty,Giardina, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
