Bermudez v. U S Dept of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review
Emanuel Luzardo Bermudez |
U S Dept of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review |
1:2022cv01032 |
April 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Elizabeth E Foote |
Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Desiree C Williams on behalf of U S Dept of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review (Attorney Desiree C Williams added to party U S Dept of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review(pty:dft)) (aty,Williams, Desiree) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion Setting regarding: #5 First MOTION for Summary Judgment . Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth E Foote. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 5 First MOTION for Summary Judgment by Emanuel Luzardo Bermudez. (Attachments: #1 Statement of material facts, #2 Memorandum / Brief, #3 Proposed order, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(aty,Gahagan, Michael) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Emanuel Luzardo Bermudez U S Dept of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review served on 5/2/2022, answer due 7/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit)(aty,Gahagan, Michael) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 4/21/2022. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to U S Attorney, U S Attorney General, Secretary of Dept of Homeland Security. (crt,Miletello, A) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U S Dept of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5073347) filed by Emanuel Luzardo Bermudez. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Proposed summons/writ, #3 Proposed summons/writ, #4 Proposed summons/writ)(Attorney Michael Wayne Gahagan added to party Emanuel Luzardo Bermudez(pty:pla))(aty,Gahagan, Michael) Modified docket text on 4/20/2022 (Miletello, A). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bermudez v. U S Dept of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Emanuel Luzardo Bermudez | |
Represented By: | Michael Wayne Gahagan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: U S Dept of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review | |
Represented By: | Desiree C Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.