Budwine v. Allen Correctional Center
Plaintiff: Kenyon Budwine
Defendant: Warden Allen Correctional Center
Case Number: 2:2011cv02079
Filed: November 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Lake Charles Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Kathleen Kay
Presiding Judge: Patricia Minaldi
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 6 Report and Recommendations, it is ORDERED that this 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kenyon Budwine be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Patricia Minaldi on 11/16/2012. (crt,FinnSld, P)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Budwine v. Allen Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Allen Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenyon Budwine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?