Abbasi Properties v. Underwriters at Lloyds London
Abbasi Properties and Abbasi Properties doing business as Royal Tandoor |
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and Underwriters at Lloyds London |
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole |
2:2021cv01302 |
May 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
James D Cain |
Kathleen Kay |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Abbasi Properties. Underwriters at Lloyds London served on 6/30/2021, answer due 7/21/2021. (aty,Biggs, Catharine) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Underwriters at Lloyds London with Jury Demand filed by Abbasi Properties.(aty,Biggs, Catharine) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Underwriters at Lloyds London. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 2 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 1/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(crt,Miletello, A) |
CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Underwriters at Lloyd's, London with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-4674492) filed by Abbasi Properties. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Catharine Biggs added to party Abbasi Properties(pty:pla))(aty,Biggs, Catharine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.