Theriot et al v. Underwriters at Lloyds London
Quintin S Theriot and Jessaka A Theriot |
Underwriters at Lloyds London |
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole |
2:2022cv01286 |
May 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
James D Cain |
Kathleen Kay |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, sent to Erin Bruce Saucier on behalf of Underwriters at Lloyds London. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 7/13/2022. (crt,Whitener, M) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Underwriters at Lloyds London.(aty,Saucier, Erin) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quintin S Theriot, Jessaka A Theriot. Underwriters at Lloyds London served on 6/9/2022, answer due 6/30/2022. (aty,LaCombe, Christopher) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. The Summons issued for service against the defendant was returned unexecuted. Accordingly, there is no answer deadline to be extended. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 6/15/2022. (jud,Kay, Kathleen) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Quintin S Theriot, Jessaka A Theriot. Underwriters at Lloyds London. (Attachments: #1 LA Secretary of State Service to Defendant, #2 Return Receipt of Summons & Suit to LA Secretary of State)(aty,LaCombe, Christopher) Modified on 6/8/2022 to remove answer deadline and service executed date. (Crick, S). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer sent to Erin Bruce Saucier on behalf of Underwriters at Lloyds London. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 6/22/2022. (crt,Crick, S) |
NOTICE of Corrective Action to Christopher Shawn LaCombe on behalf of Jessaka A Theriot, Quintin S Theriot regarding #6 Summons Returned Executed,. Action taken: Docket text modified to reflect Summons Returned Unexecuted - Service of the complaint is not considered properly executed (service within the State of Louisiana cannot be effected through certified mail); therefore answer deadline has been terminated and service executed date removed. (crt,Crick, S) |
Motions Transferred regarding #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with consent . Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with consent by Underwriters at Lloyds London. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(Attorney Erin Bruce Saucier added to party Underwriters at Lloyds London(pty:dft))(aty,Saucier, Erin) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Underwriters at Lloyds London. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 2 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO 1. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 12/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Breach of Insurance Contract against Underwriters at Lloyds London (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5103536) filed by Quintin S Theriot, Jessaka A Theriot. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Christopher Shawn LaCombe added to party Jessaka A Theriot(pty:pla), Attorney Christopher Shawn LaCombe added to party Quintin S Theriot(pty:pla))(aty,LaCombe, Christopher) |
CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.