King et al v. Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp et al
Diann King and Mike King |
Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp, Bayer Health Care, LLC, Schering-Plough Corp and Apotex Corp |
3:2009cv00465 |
March 23, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office |
Richland |
Karen L Hayes |
Robert G James |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 RULING re 61 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Schering Corp and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 4/14/10. (crt,DickersonSld, D) |
Filing 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 21 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, AND 23 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Schering Corp, RECOMMENDING the motions be GRANTED IN PART, and that Judgment be entered in favor of Bayer and Sch ering, DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's punitive damages and attorney's fees claims and all other claims not arising under the Louisiana Products Liability Act. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the motions to dismiss be otherwise DENIED . For the same reasons, IT IS RECOMMENDED that Judgment be entered in favor of Apotex Incorporated, DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE, Plaintiffs punitive damages and attorney's fees claims and all other claims not arising under the LPLA. Objections to R&R due by 6/25/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 6/8/09. (crt,Crawford, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.