Ashley v. East Carroll Detention Center et al
Plaintiff: Christopher T Ashley
Defendant: East Carroll Detention Center, Harris, East Carroll Sheriff Dept and Mark W Shumate
Case Number: 3:2010cv01076
Filed: June 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Monroe Office
County: East Carroll
Presiding Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Robert G James
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 6 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed herein, to the extent adopted by the Court, and for those additional reasons in the Court's Ruling 7 , noting the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendati on in the record, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's civil rights complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.c . 1915 and 1915A. to the extent that Plaintiff attempts to bring a state law tort claim against Defendant Frederick Bias, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the tort claim, and the claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff's right to reassert that claim in state courts. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 11/17/10. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
October 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Christopher T Ashley, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's civil rights complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted in accordance with the provisions of 28USC1915 and 1915A. Objections to R&R due by 11/1/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 10/13/10. (crt,Crawford, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ashley v. East Carroll Detention Center et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher T Ashley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: East Carroll Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: East Carroll Sheriff Dept
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark W Shumate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?