Brooks v. Jackson Parish Correctional Center

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Louisiana Western District Brooks v. Jackson Parish Correctional Center

Brooks v. Jackson Parish Correctional Center

Plaintiff:	Miketavious Brooks
Defendant:	Jackson Parish Correctional Center
Case Number:	3:2010cv01886
Filed:	December 10, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office:	Monroe Office
County:	Claiborne
Presiding Judge:	Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge:	Robert G James
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 1, 2011	Filing 14 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 13 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's civil rights Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state a claim which relief may be granted in accordance with the provisions of 28 USC 1915 and 1915A. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 07/01/11. (crt,Yocum, M)
May 19, 2011	Filing 11 MEMORANDUM RULING having fully reviewed the record in this matter including plaintiff's objection and the motion to amend, the court DECLINES TO ADOPT 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; plaintiff's motion for extension of time, contained within his objection doc 9 is GRANTED, and his motion to amend doc 10 is GRANTED; as requested in his motion to amend, plaintiff's claims against JPCC are DISMISSED; this matter is REMANDED TO Magistrate Judge Hayes for further proceedings and the issuance of a second Report and Recommendation Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 5/18/11. (crt,Davis, C)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 1, 2011

Filing 14 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 13 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's civil rights Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state a claim which relief may be granted in accordance with the provisions of 28 USC 1915 and 1915A. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 07/01/11. (crt,Yocum, M)

May 19, 2011

Filing 11 MEMORANDUM RULING having fully reviewed the record in this matter including plaintiff's objection and the motion to amend, the court DECLINES TO ADOPT 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; plaintiff's motion for extension of time, contained within his objection doc 9 is GRANTED, and his motion to amend doc 10 is GRANTED; as requested in his motion to amend, plaintiff's claims against JPCC are DISMISSED; this matter is REMANDED TO Magistrate Judge Hayes for further proceedings and the issuance of a second Report and Recommendation Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 5/18/11. (crt,Davis, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooks v. Jackson Parish Correctional Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miketavious Brooks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Jackson Parish Correctional Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?