Vincent v. Smith

Plaintiff: Greguy Vincent
Defendant: John Smith
Case Number: 3:2011cv00470
Filed: March 18, 2011
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Monroe Office
County: Tensas
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Robert G James
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 20, 2011 20 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 19 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss 16 filed on behalf of respondents is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 9/20/11. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vincent v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Greguy Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Smith
Represented By: Katherine W Vincent
Represented By: Janice E Hebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?