Unites States of America v. Davison et al
| USA |
| Henry Edward Davison and Ernestine Bradley Davison |
| 3:2011cv00817 |
| June 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Monroe Office |
| Richland |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Robert G James |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 47 Notice of Appeal, filed by Ernestine Bradley Davison, Henry Edward Davison. Therefore, to the extent that Defendants' Notice of Appeal is a motion for stay, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 6/28/12. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
|
|
Filing
37
RULING re 23 First MOTION for New Trial filed by Ernestine Bradley Davison and Henry Edward Davison, 27 First MOTION to Amend/Correct 3 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim filed by Ernestine Bradley Davison and Henry Edward Davison,and 31 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ernestine Bradley Davison and Henry Edward Davison. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 1/23/12. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM RULING re 9 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by USA. The Government's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the Defendants' counterclaim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 12/15/11. (crt,Yocum, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
