Burke v. Cox et al

Plaintiff: Gilbert R Burke
Defendant: Johnson, Larry G Cox, McCloud and Brooks
Case Number: 3:2013cv02154
Filed: June 27, 2013
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Monroe Office
County: Madison
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Robert G James
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 6, 2014 37 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 36 Report and Recommendation, DENYING 29 Oral Motion for Judgment on partial findings (incorrectly styled as a " Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law") ; DENYING 30 Motion for Discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED , ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Gilbert Burke's claims against Defendants Sheriff Larry cox, Major Antonio Johnson, and Captain McCloud are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE on the merits, but DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of pro ceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 USC 1915(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Gilbert Burke's motion for appointment of counsel and request for transfer with associated complaints of retaliation 34 is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 11/6/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
May 30, 2014 22 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections there to having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 19] is GRANTED IN PART, and that Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Captain Brooks are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in their entirety. The Motion for Summary Judgment is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FUR THER ORDERED that this matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge to hold an evidentiary hearing (to include all witnesses and evidence to be presented by all remaining parties), and thereafter, to issue findings to the court, via report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/30/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burke v. Cox et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry G Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McCloud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gilbert R Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?