Kongin v. Holder
Plaintiff: Marco Kongin
Defendant: Eric Holder, Jr
Case Number: 3:2014cv00012
Filed: January 6, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Monroe Office
County: Tensas
Presiding Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Robert G James
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 JUDGMENT adopting Report and Recommendation 13 , and GRANTING Motion to Dismiss 10 , and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 6/25/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kongin v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marco Kongin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Holder, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?