Dexta v. Holder

Plaintiff: Bolivar Enrique Dexta
Defendant: Eric Holder, Jr
Case Number: 3:2014cv00028
Filed: January 9, 2014
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Monroe Office
County: Tensas
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Robert G James
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 9, 2014 17 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT. The Report and Recommendation 16 having been considered no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss 12 is hereby GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/9/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dexta v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Holder, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bolivar Enrique Dexta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?