Crossley v. Cain

Plaintiff: Roderick Crossley
Defendant: Burl Cain
Case Number: 3:2015cv02093
Filed: July 24, 2015
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Monroe Office
County: Acadia
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Robert G James
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 2, 2016 5 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendation re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Roderick Crossley. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because Petitioner failed to exhaust available state court remedies, and his claims are now procedurally defaulted. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 2/2/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crossley v. Cain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roderick Crossley
Represented By: Shane Paul Landry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burl Cain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?