Lexing v. Edwards et al
Harvey R Lexing |
John Bel Edwards, Albert E Loomis, Mary Hamilton, Marketa Garner Walters, Keesha Bordelon, Anika Lashaye Carston and Jo Caston |
3:2017cv01092 |
August 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Monroe Office |
Ouachita |
Karen L Hayes |
Robert G James |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 JUDGMENT Adopting 43 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. It Is Ordered that 11 , 12 and 13 Motions to Dismiss are Granted. Plaintiff's official capacity claims against Defendants, John Bell Edwards, Marketa Garner Walte rs, and Keesha Bordelon, are Dismissed Without Prejudice. It Is Further Ordered that 13 , 17 and 19 Motions to Dismiss are Granted. Plaintiff's federal law claims against Keesha Bordelon, in her individual capacity, Albert E Loomis III, M ary Hamilton and Anika Lashaye Carston and Jo Caston, in her individual and official capacities are Dismissed With Prejudice. It Is Further Ordered that Plaintiff's remaining state law claims are hereby Dismissed Without Prejudice. It Is Furth er Ordered that 17 and 19 Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement is Denied. It Is Further Ordered that, to the extent that Plaintiff moves to amend his Complaint, the motion is Denied as futile in light of the Court's analysis. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 5/22/2018. (crt,Crawford, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.