Chafford v. Union Pacific Railroad Co et al
Plaintiff: Ariessanea S Chafford
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co, Curtis Blair and Jeffrey Delph
Case Number: 3:2021cv01498
Filed: June 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Terry A Doughty
Referring Judge: Kayla D McClusky
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 6/3/2021. (crt,Leday, A)
June 2, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Union Pacific Railroad Co.(aty,Courtney, Pamela)
June 2, 2021 Filing 3 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER. Referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/2/2021. (crt,Miletello, A)
June 2, 2021 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Union Pacific Railroad Co identifying Corporate Parents Union Pacific Corp, Southern Pacific Rail Corp for Union Pacific Railroad Co. (aty,Courtney, Pamela) Modified docket text on 6/2/2021 (Miletello, A).
June 2, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 4th JDC Morehouse Parish, Case Number 2021-140 with Jury Demand; (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-4692426) filed by Union Pacific Railroad Co. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 State court petition)(Attorney Pamela LeBato Courtney added to party Union Pacific Railroad Co(pty:dft))(aty,Courtney, Pamela)
June 2, 2021 CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Miletello, A)
June 2, 2021 STATE COURT Service Returned Executed as to Union Pacific Railroad Co. Union Pacific Railroad Co answer due 6/9/2021. STATE COURT Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Curtis Blair, Jeffrey Delph. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY: The PDF image can be found in Attachment #2 to Document #1, Notice of Removal. (crt,Miletello, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chafford v. Union Pacific Railroad Co et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co
Represented By: Ashley Dawnise Boutte
Represented By: Pamela LeBato Courtney
Represented By: David A Fraser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Curtis Blair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Delph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ariessanea S Chafford
Represented By: Philip Jason House
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?